Page 1 of 1

Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 15:34
by Brody Craft
Unsteadystani Conflict
Cause: Acclaimed "genocide" to the Poopsi Tribe, whoch was sparked by an envoy murdered by the Poopsi Tribe
Show
Side 1
International Federation of Indigenous Justice
Mox
New Aldorria
AEOY
Show
Side 2
Angrypore
Unsteadystan

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:01
by Ace_TFC
Avalon will stand with Angrypore despite the mess.

While we do not condone genocide, we do believe that there could be less violent actions that can be taken into account. Avalon envoys will be meeting with Angrypore to help them in this diplomatic crisis. We do suggest that nations restore relations in order to do something about the situation.

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:10
by Graham_Memeboi
Gracity sides with "side 1", as a member of the IFIJ.

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:11
by Graham_Memeboi
We must de-escalate the situation, we are not the aggressor!

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:15
by Ace_TFC
Graham_Memeboi wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:11
We must de-escalate the situation, we are not the aggressor!
However to point out, the IFIJ is somewhat being aggressive to Unsteadystan by sending forces even if the colony is not a member and no consent is given.

Hmmm

Is there a side 3? A side that doesn't support what Unsteadystan has done but supports a more peaceful resolution? If so, then Avalon's there

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:17
by Ahmad Nur Aizat
Ace_TFC wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:15
Graham_Memeboi wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:11
We must de-escalate the situation, we are not the aggressor!
However to point out, the IFIJ is somewhat being aggressive to Unsteadystan by sending forces even if the colony is not a member and no consent is given.

Hmmm

Is there a side 3? A side that doesn't support what Unsteadystan has done but supports a more peaceful resolution? If so, then Avalon's there
It's not a force, the hell

IFIJ guards are just protecting the tribes, the colonists are just hypocrites

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:20
by Ace_TFC
Ahmad Nur Aizat wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:17
Ace_TFC wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:15
Graham_Memeboi wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:11
We must de-escalate the situation, we are not the aggressor!
However to point out, the IFIJ is somewhat being aggressive to Unsteadystan by sending forces even if the colony is not a member and no consent is given.

Hmmm

Is there a side 3? A side that doesn't support what Unsteadystan has done but supports a more peaceful resolution? If so, then Avalon's there
It's not a force, the hell

IFIJ guards are just protecting the tribes, the colonists are just hypocrites
However it may seem to others (Angrypore) that this is a sign of aggression. It would be better if the IFIJ has permission from Angrypore regarding the matter.

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 17:08
by RyanVJ
We support Avalon's statement, we do not see the need for further escalation.

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 19:11
by Ahmad Nur Aizat
Many tribe clans are becoming rogue as they heard the news of the killing of the Poopsi tribe leader

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 19:23
by Graham_Memeboi
Gracity updates

Gracity media broadcasts the news of Angrypore and Unsteadystan to the public. With over 4.3m people watching (The population is 10.2m).

A Theotwitter poll ended in this:
Option 1: Pay for their actions - 34%
Option 2: War - 5%
Option 3: Develop their nation - 40%
Option 4: Economic Embargo - 21%
((The poll was in no way related to the Government))

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 0:29
by Brody Craft
Verderiesdre is Neutral for now.

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 13:20
by THEMAX
AEOY is neutral but will carefully watch the situation there .

Re: Unsteadystani Conflict

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 15:25
by Monarch of P
Ahmad Nur Aizat wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:17
Ace_TFC wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:15
Graham_Memeboi wrote:
Sun Jan 13, 2019 16:11
We must de-escalate the situation, we are not the aggressor!
However to point out, the IFIJ is somewhat being aggressive to Unsteadystan by sending forces even if the colony is not a member and no consent is given.

Hmmm

Is there a side 3? A side that doesn't support what Unsteadystan has done but supports a more peaceful resolution? If so, then Avalon's there
It's not a force, the hell

IFIJ guards are just protecting the tribes, the colonists are just hypocrites
It is so very ironic that the ifij is the one calling us hypocrites. I personally doubt that the "murder" of one person is a genocide.